Sponsored by HUMAN Speakers TORSEN RETURN

Don't run! Don't hit delete! This is the nice version...

Subject: A New Look at Torsens (10/19/99)
From: Gary Lewis Gary.Lewis@West.Boeing.com

Can you please post the comments below on a webpage and update/track them as we (you, me, the Audifans list, etc.) see fit.

One note to the list: I don't own this stuff, so let's call me a Trustee for the moment (and I ain't gonna be a judge or arbitrator), unless someone can think of a better name (and be nice. I've been getting pooped on everyday lately. some of you guys are like seagulls :-)

Thanks, Gary

Here is the current list of theories in response to the question:"Why is it that Torsen equipped Audi cars in America experience a handling condition at the limit in turns that renders the car uncontrollable (nicknamed 'Spiderbite'), while Torsen equipped Audi cars in other countries such as New Zealand and Britain do not?"

top - one - two - three - four - five - six - seven

1. (Phil Payne.) Possible differences in the specification of the alignment job itself, _NOT_ the actual numbers used. Hints have suggested it's a 'less than one hour' job for US dealers, whereas Audi in Europe allows two hours and BR Motorsport frequently take three.

top - one - two - three - four - five - six - seven

2. (Jim Haseltine) Where the driver sits. Dave & Phil sit on the right-hand side, Jeff & Scott on the left, so the cg of their cars are different. Now unless Audi build cars that have a cg on the centreline when unlanden (bet they don't) then the cg's when loaded will be in different places, not just displaced by similar amounts left or right. We probably all know how the positioning of a load can affect the handling of a vehicle. I'm not saying that this is the answer but it could well be a contributing factor.

top - one - two - three - four - five - six - seven

3. (Jim Haseltine) maybe a combination of the different cg and Ur-q chassis/suspension have moved the bite point outside the handling envelope of an Ur-q? Before the Torsen reaches the 'bite' the driver has already lost it...

top - one - two - three - four - five - six - seven

4. (Gary Lewis) Is it possible that some components between the Euro vehicles and USA vehicles are different? I do know that the right hand drive vehicles have different parts, so there is one example. But what about gearing and differentials, other driveline components? We admittedly get the shit stuff here in the USA, maybe we got the retards version of a torque sensing device.

top - one - two - three - four - five - six - seven

5. (Phil Payne) Bad translation by Bentley?

I only have the ur-quattro running gear microfiche here. In both English and German there is an error that was corrected by a Bulletin to be filed in the microfiche folder.

So much is copied between the hydraulic lifter quattro microfiches (the ur-quattro gearbox fiche refers the reader to the 200Q fiche in several places) that it's entirely possible such an error also exists (or existed at one time) in the 200Q fiche. I don't know - I have to view a copy.

I also don't know why the US source for this information in Bentley - all of the material is available in English on real Audi microfiche. Audi, though, send out periodic corrections. Does Bentley?

top - one - two - three - four - five - six - seven

6. (Mike Mulholland) dave and phil and (name deleted on request) drive their torsen equipped cars hard primarily on highways and bi ways. I would bet that they don't use the same _track learned_ driving techniques on the roads they drive because they are doing it for sheer exhilaration and joy and not to earn a competitive advantage. dave mentioned that walter rohrl drove his torsen ur quattro around a track _very_ competitively with no problem. but was it under race conditions or just fast.... from my bicycle racing days (canadian champion) I know that many can go fast, but in order to win you go where others fear to tread. the risk is to crash and burn _or_ to win. winning was always worth the crashes used to learn how to win. so although walter is a professional racer with a skill level possibly higher than scott and jeff, he had no problems in a torsen ur quattro at the limit on the track. so is the difference possibly driving technique?

top - one - two - three - four - five - six - seven

7. (Kirby Smith) I suggest that while alignment can change a car's intrinsic handling (U or O) and thereby make the vehicle more or less controllable, a U-O-U oscillation, such as reported by Scott and Jeff, requires two lags through the servomechanism made up of vehicle and driver. Where might these lags come from? One is from chassis dynamics, i.e., the delay in vehicle attitude and slip response due to a steering input. The second, I assert, is from the driver, i.e., the delay in steering response due to a "seat of the pants" input. If these times are commensurate in a given servomechanism, and the "gain" is high enough, the system _will_ oscillate and likely go unstable. Notwithstanding how well any of the "protagonists" understand, or agree upon theory, we have to take at face value that competent drivers have achieved different results. This suggests to me that they, together with their cars, either have different pairs of reaction times or different "gains" or both.

RETURN
Subject: Questions about Torsen Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 20:27:04 EST From: PlyBoyDoct@aol.com To: quattro@audifans.com (Quattro List) This is by no means another Crazy Torsen Trend. I am wondering what is torsen is. But all the archieve is techie stuff. I want the dummie version of it. What is it exactly? And what the heck is a Spider bite? What does it actually do? Please reply to me personally. I don't want to start another one of those trend. Keep in mind, I want the simpliest version of it, TIA JasonC 89 200t10v Redmond WA Subject: Re: Questions about Torsen Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:58:01 -0500 From: Huw Powell Reply-To: one@humanspeakers.com Organization: HUMAN Speakers To: PlyBoyDoct@aol.com, Huw Powell References: 1 > I am wondering what is torsen is. But all the archieve is techie stuff. Well, as you know, a lot of Audis are "quattros". These are all wheel drive vehicles. When more than one wheel is driven by the same rotating shaft, there must be a way to allow the wheels to rotate at different speeds (since, eg, the outside arc of a corner is longer than the inside arc). The devices that allow this are referred to as "differentials". Look at the rear end of any classic rear wheel drive American iron, and you will see what is sometimes called the "pumpkin" right in the middle, where the drive shaft connects to it. This is the differential. It allows one wheel to turn faster than the other. Whiel this allows smooth cornering, it also can rpesent a traction problem, in that if one wheel has no traction and spins, the other wheel will not turn at all and the vehicle is stuck. The American iron reference to the solution is the "Limited Slip Differential" - it prevents one rear wheel from getting all the "spin", ie when one wheel has no traction for some reason the other is still able to get some torque and "push" a bit, to get you out of the slippery situation. Front wheel drive cars usually have the differential built into the same casing as the transmission. All wheel drive cars (I'm going to ignore four wheel drive trucks as they are quite different) have three of them - a center differential to allow the front and rear axles to rotate separately, and then a front and a rear differential to let the wheels on each side have differing rates. Now there is still the problem of slip. If one wheel in one of these cars is spinning, nothing else moves. So the first generation Quattro cars have what are called "differential locks" for the center and rear differential. When the lock is activated the two axles connected to the differential *cannot* rotate at different speeds, they are locked together. So if one rear wheel is in mud or on ice and the other has traction, locking the rear differential makes the tire with good traction spin at the same speed as the one without - and you drive away. These locks require driver input and knowledge, however (ie, you must know when they are appropriate, to engage or disengage them). The "Torque Sensing" or "Torsen" differential is a slightly different animal. Rather than having the ability to let one axle spin and the other not move at all, it allocates the "push" to whatever axle is actually "using" it. Most of the time this is unnoticeable, but in our hypothetical of one wheel spinning, the Torsen limits the spinning wheel to 75% of the amount of power going to that pair of axles - and the other tire gets some "push" and you are out of the slipperies. That's what a "Torsen" is. A differntial that does not require locks to deal with very slippery ("low Cf" - Coefficient of friction) situations. > And what the heck is a Spider bite? A circumstance supposedly induced by this differential when the car is being slid around a curve, which can actually be a controlled situation with a well designed suspension geometry, where the car exhibits an "out of control" alternation between understeer and oversteer. Understeer is where the car is not responding to steering wheel inputs - the front wheels keep sliding forward - and oversteer is where the rear wheels break out and the body of the car turns more than the given steering wheel input. Dealing with one or the other is usually quite easy for a driver, and whiel these situations would be regarded as an emergency on the public roads, race car drivers enter them all the time in order to get through curves and out onto the following straights as fast as possible. The operation of the car can change radically, though. For instance, during a corner where the tires are sliding sideways, frequently the car is steered not with the front wheels and steering wheel (which are turned to one side, but that's not the point), but with the accelerator pedal. By changing power input the car turns more or less due tot he amount of under or oversteer induced. So the "spider bite", being an unpredictable handling phenomenon occurring during these conditions, will be a detriment to the race-ability of the car, whether going very fast or dry tar or 20 mph in a corner on ice in a winter rally. It also could be very dangerous to the ordinary driver caught in an "emergency" situation. Say you hit a patch of ice going around a corner. Hopefully the things you do to stay in control and the way the car reacts to them will behave as exaggerated versions of the way the car usually handles. (I have a lot of fun at some of these extremes, by the way, on one or two local curves where I feel I am not endangering others by skidding - the Audi is amazingly controllable) If the car in an emergency displays the so-called "spider bite" it will become hazardous to the operator. Personally I believe that the "spider bite", which was arrogantly named by it's cheif (and almost only) proponent, is most likely a result of a combination of poor suspension set up (which might be in the timiest details) and erroneous driving technique. Because otherwise it would turn up one heck of a lot more. hth. PS don't quote this in public yet, I'm gonna post it on my web site anyway after I edit it. Subject: Re: Questions about Torsen Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 11:48:03 EST From: PlyBoyDoct@aol.com To: one@humanspeakers.com Wow, that completely cleared up everything except why people are arguing about it. I know now that with torsen, you can get out of a spider bite easier. How does it sense slip and send power to the wheel that doesn't slip? So your basicallly telling me that before torsen, people had to turn it to center and rear. Thanks, Huw! Jason -- Huw Powell https://www.humanspeakers.com/audi/ 82 Audi Coupe; 84 4kq; 85 Coupe GT; 73 F250 http://people.ne.mediaone.net/audi/thoughts.htm